Introduction
In their rather short foray into the headphone market, Focal
has become my favorite brand for personal music enjoyment. Their line of higher
end over-ears are excellent sounding and well-built tanks and I’ve enjoyed each
one I’ve tried. I had yet to try any of their IEMs in their line up: the Spark
and the Sphear, or their wireless and “S” models.
Recently, these models have seen dramatic price drops with
the Focal Spark found for as little as $19.99, the wireless for $35, and the Sphear
for $65 on many popular online marketplaces. I decided to get the Focal Spark
on an Amazon third-party retailer for $24.99 (white cost more than blue), and I’m
happy to say, for this price, this is a really solid offering.
The Spark originally retails at $69, while the wireless
model MSRP was at $99. Even at these prices, the models can compete with the
best China has to offer in-terms of quality and budget performance.
Let’s take a quick look.
Build/Accessories
The Focal Spark features a 9.5mm dynamic driver housed in an
extremely lightweight aluminum body. The polished mirrored ends add luxury to
this product as well as the machined out Focal wave logo which also acts as a
bass port on the back. Given this design, the IEM is meant to be worn down,
which is more comfortable and easier to put on for many, and I never had issues
wearing these with foam tips.
The cable is not removable and replaceable. The cable is
also flat, which I typically do not like, but isn’t a tangled mess like I have
seen in other brands that go with the flat cable look (Audeze Sine and iSines,
for example). The cable also features a mic and control module that works with
Android devices to Play/Pause and adjust volume and skip tracks. This volume
controls did not seem to work on iPhones however.
In addition to this, Focal added a set of tips in varying
sizes and a nice fabric, zippered carrying case that is very small and compact
and has the Focal logo on it. I found this case quite nice and usable.
Sound
The Spark is a V-shaped IEM, so it’ll color the sound a bit
with emphasized bass and treble. The Frequency Response chart I plotted using
MiniDSP EARS and Dayton IMM-6 do not fully represent how controlled the bass is
though.
If you look at the chart on it’s own, it’ll look like a bass
monster. And that’s why you can’t just look at an FR Curve and call it a day.
There’s other things to factor in – like impulse, decay, and distortion. So, back
to bass – I find the bass is definitely emphasized and has great quantity, but
also has a nice speed of attack to it that is starting to feel like a Focal
signature. It’s nowhere near the speed and attack or the dynamics of their high-end
over-ear lineup, but it’s got a surprisingly good speed to it for ultra-budget
dynamic in-ear drivers. And this allows the bass to be relatively tight and
clean despite it’s obvious boost.
The mid-range, despite being recessed in the V-shape signature,
sounds smooth and tonally coherent. In busy tracks, or ones with heavier bass, the
mids do tend to fall a bit behind in the scene though. On occasion, the typical
emphasized bass muddiness does rear it’s head on the lower mids and that’s
unfortunate. This doesn’t really become an issue for me on simpler tracks or
when listening at lower volumes, but as your move volume up, the sense of bass also
does increase and therefore the muddiness starts to creep up a little more.
Treble is surprisingly non-sibilant and not in anyway harsh.
It’s actually rather smooth, given the V-shaped signature, where this area
typically becomes very peaky. Focal seemed to control this by dropping the
treble spike in the typical area where harshness and sibilance can occur, around
8KHz, and this seems to help keep the general sound signature very smooth while
still retaining energy and air, as the upper treble continues to climb back up.
The soundstage on this IEM is medium-wide and imaging is
quite good for a $69 IEM and especially good for $20-25.
Comparisons
Knowledge Zenith AS10
The AS10 and Spark have similar sound signatures however I
found the AS10 to have punchier bass, but more bloated as well. The mids on the
AS10 sound more recessed and the treble sharper and edgier. The Spark on the
other hand sounds more laid back and controlled.
Tin Hifi T2/T3
The Tin Hifi products have been extremely popular and both
offer a more neutral bass and mids section than the Spark, however will have a
see a sharper, and sometimes harsher treble. Both of these increase in treble
as you move up the frequency chart, while the Spark drops off in the sibilance
region and increases later on for more air. The Spark will definitely be more
bassy and warm compared to the more cooler sounding T2 and T3s and will not compete
with the details of the T3.
Knowledge Zenith ZSN
The ZSN follows very similar tonal characteristics of the
Tin T2 but with a mids-area that’s more akin to the Spark as it’s slightly
recessed compared to the more coherent and forward mids in the Tin Hifi
products. The Spark will be more bassy than the ZSN as well, but will have less
harshness in the lower treble than the ZSN, while providing more extension
later on.
TRN V80
The V80 is another one similar to the T2 with even more
upper end treble brightness, and is therefore, quite a bit brighter than the
Spark which will move forward a lot of details and energy. While the V80 is
slightly warmer than the T2, the Spark still tops all of these in terms of bass
boost.
Overall
I found the Focal Spark to be quite an attractive and fun
sounding IEM at the $25 price I paid for it and still find it a good price at
it’s MSRP of $69, even when comparing it to it’s Chinese-brand competition like
the KZ AS10 and Tin Audio T2/T3. I really enjoyed the bass attack on it that
did not bleed as much as I thought it would into the mids while being boosted
for working with genres I don’t typically listen to, and I also really liked
the look of the bullet-shaped aluminum housing with it’s inscribed Focal
branding and cut out Focal wave vent ports.
Where I found lacking was the occasional bass-mids muddiness
and the non-detachable cable. Despite being a flat cable, which I typically
dislike, this specific iteration of it is not horrible. It’s serviceable. And
in general, this is quite a serviceable IEM for $25 street price right now.
--
View the product ratings on
Antdroid's IEM Ranking List and/or Antdroid's Headphone Ranking List
Great stuff Anthony! Stumbled across your site today and it seems you have become THE go to man when it comes to the measurements of popular phones out now. Keep up the excellent work, I only have 1 request: please include the Raw Frequency Response graph with the Harman IEM Target in the review, like you used to a bit earlier. It clears a lot of things up.
ReplyDelete