The Scottish outfit, RHA, recently released a fully closed
IEM that features a planar magnetic driver in it. While planar magnetic in-ear
monitors and earphones are not new, there has never been one that has been made
in this smaller form factor and fully closed.
The Audeze iSine series was a large unit that was worn as a
hybrid between a clip-on headphone a la Koss KSC series and in-ear canal
phones. They sound beautifully with the Cipher cable, Reveal plugin, or the
right EQ, but sounded pretty wonky in it’s stock form.
The Unique Melody ME1 was released shortly after the
original iSine 10 and 20 were released and featured a more traditional in-ear
monitor style but with a large Audeze LCD series look. It was a fully open-back
planar IEM like the iSine before it. It comes in both a Universal and Custom
IEM option. I have owned the iSine 10 and the ME1 universal, and now own the
ME1 custom.
More recently, two Chinese brands have come out with their
own planar IEMs, the Senfer MT100 and the Toneking BL1. They both feature vents
in them, and are not truly closed backs are are available for around $200 each.
I have yet to hear either one of these.
And finally, the RHA CL2 at $899, was released.
RHA graciously sent out a set of these IEMs around the world
as part of the Head-Fi Tour and I happened to miss the boat during the initial
sign-up. After contacting RHA towards the end of the tour, they did not hesitate
to allow me a chance to audition these, so I am very grateful for this
opportunity to demo them and provide you my insights.
Build and Accessories
The RHA CL2 packaging comes packed with accessories, all of
the highest quality. The first thing I discovered was the various variety of
cables. The CL2 comes with a copper-colored standard 3.5mm cable with preformed
hooks, as well as a silver-colored balanced 2.5mm cable with hooks. In addition
to this is a neckband cable that converts the CL2 into a Bluetooth device. The
Cl2 features mmcx connectors, so users can also use other cables with it as
well.
A small selection of tips of various sizes is also included
in the packaging, as well and product manual, airplane adaptor, and a usb cable
for charging the Bluetooth neckband.
The CL2 features a hard ceramic shell that houses the single
planar-magnetic driver. The closed shell has a shiny, glossy piano black finish
and feels very solid and lightweight in the hand as well as in the ear. With
about an hour of continuous playtime, I do sometimes start to feel a little ear
pain on my left ear, but not as much on the right. This was a little surprising
given the small size and good fit I was getting on initial placement.
For this review, I will focus mainly on using memory foam
tips, but I also had lucky with SpinFit CP145 tipes. The Bluetooth cable and it’s
quality are not part of this review, and I will be primarily discussing how it
sounds based on 2.5mm balanced connections when available.
Sound
First off, the RHA CL2 requires a lot of power. Unlike many
IEMs, these have very low sensitivity and require a bit of power output to
drive them well. I used the Cl2 in combination with various sources including
the Pioneer XDP-300R balanced Digital Audio Player and the Monolith THX-AAA
balanced amp/DAC. I also used these with the Cavalli Liquid Spark and on some
occasions, the Pete Millet Starving Student Tube Hybrid. Some times the source
files came directly from my PC, the XDP-300R or the Hidizs AP80. In all cases,
files were either CD-Rip FLACs or streaming through the highest quality Spotify
or Tidal Hi-Res or Master quality.
My music selection was vastly varied throughout the time I
listened with the CL2. My playlist stretches across most genres and my typical
baseline album to listen to is Fleetwood Mac’s Rumours, as this showcases
various instruments and 4 unique singers. I also tend to throw in the mix Chris
Stapleton, Norah Jones, The Civil Wars, Tegan and Sara, Radiohead, Olafaur Arnalds,
Daft Punk, The Roots, Vince Guaraldi, and various other artists and songs when
demoing headphones.
First off, the CL2 is one of the fastest headphones I’ve had
the pleasure of listening to. It’s not as fast as the Stax SR-009, but it’s
faster than any of the planar magnetic headphones I’ve listened to and I own and
have listened to quite a few. It’s also faster than the Focal dynamic driver
headphones I have (The Elex and Elegia). In general, it makes the iSine 10 and
Unique Melody ME1 sound slow with longer decay time. The transient speed is a
bit ethereal in this sense.
While the bass response actually shows a little bit of a
hump, the speed doesn’t allow the bass to bleed over at all. It’s very tight
and controlled, and even sounds a tad lean due to its fast attack. When
listening to it side-by-side with the ME1, the bass on the ME1 is weightier and
meaner, despite it being rolled-off, but also sounds slower in comparison.
The mids is where the CL2 starts to fall apart a little bit.
Male vocals sound natural and wonderful. Again the bass never bothers the mids,
and the lean bass and mids are clean and almost analytical in a sense. It does
sometimes needs a little more body, especially if you’re used listening to the
Audeze LCD series or the HD6X0 from Sennheiser, or even the ME1. In a sense,
the iSine 10/20 have this sort of leaner sounding mids, but the CL2 is even
leaner. It is a type of sound I do enjoy though, as is the case in the Focal
Elex I absolutely love.
The upper mids is where things start to get a little, well,
weird. This is due to an abnormal rise in the upper mids that peaks up around 4KHz
in the lower treble and then steeply drops down to 6KHz. Normally, I do enjoy a
little bit or presence here, but the CL2 rises over 5-7dB more than I am used
to in this region, and it’s an area, again, that I like boosted (see Hifiman
HE560, Focal Elex, Tin Audio T2, KZ ZSN, etc as examples of headphones I gave
good scores to and share a peak here).
This giant peak does a few things. First, it completely exaggerates
string instruments and brings them front and center. It also makes cymbals
splash more. In both cases, these sound unnaturally high and harsh. I love hearing
the intricacies of guitar work, and that peak does help you hear every last
detail, but it makes the timbre off and sound very unnatural. In addition, this
peak makes the upper-mids and especially female vocals, sound veiled and
compressed and, again, unnatural. I never enjoyed Norah Jones or Stevie Nicks,
and Liz Fraser’s crazy voice sounds even crazier.
The rest of the upper treble range is also boosted, but does
not suffer as badly with large peaks, though is still a tad uneven. The fast
planar speed really helps level off this area though and gives it an electrostatic-type
sound to it. Very fast and slightly artificial.
Conclusion
In comparison, the ME1 is quite dark sounding. The ME1 is a
shade darker than Diffuse Field neutral, but in general hovers very closely to
that sound profile, while can be at fault for a small bump around 1KHz which
creates a tad of shouty sound. The CIEM version I have cleans that area up a
little bit and it’s less bothersome, while generally evening out the upper mids
and treble.
I found that while the ME1 has some unevenness in sound and
is darker and richer than my typical preference, that is was much more coherent
than the CL2, and that was really due to that large peak in the lower treble.
Luckily with a little bit of equalizer work, and bumping
that region down 5dB or more, the CL2 starts to sound more normal, and helps fix some of its biggest flaws. Similarly, the ME1
can be fixed with some smaller adjustments in the raising the treble region a
couple dB and raising the subbass up. The iSine can be fixed using the Cipher
cable, Reveal Plugin, or some small tweaks using EQ.
What am I getting at? It seems every planar magnetic IEM has
some flaws right now, but they benefit from very low distortion numbers and ability
to eq to your needs. I think the Cl2 requires the most EQ work to correct it’s
flaw, and I find it’s offering price a little high. The overall package is
quite handsome and attractive with the nice cables and Bluetooth kit provided
though.
--
View the product ratings on
Antdroid's IEM Ranking List and/or Antdroid's Headphone Ranking List
I wouldn't trade my "flawed" CL2's straight up for any earphone currently available and many happy owners
ReplyDeletefeel the same.
That's fine. Everyone hears things differently. I have my own sound signature tastes and you don't have to agree with them as I don't have to agree with yours but it's a very subjective hobby. Harman's Sean Olive and others have tried to research this subjective audio thing for headphones over the past 7 years and developed their Harman Target curves. I have my personal tastes that are slightly different than it, but in general, it's still a nice balanced signature and the CL2s deter from both the newest target curves as well as the Diffuse Field target that was originally developed in 2013. Not many headphones follow either to a T either.
Delete